Showing posts with label Scotland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scotland. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 31, 2019

The Battle of Mons Graupius



Julius Agricola arrived in Britannia in the year 77 and took up the office of governor. He had a decorated résumé, as he previously served as governor of Aquitania from 74-76 and held the office of suffect consul of Rome in 76 before being sent to govern Britannia. Agricola also had plenty of prior military experience in Britain; he had served with Governor Suetonius Paulinus during the devastating revolt of Boudicca in 60 or 61, and Emperor Vespasian appointed Agricola to command the Twentieth Legion in Britannia from 69 to 73. With such administrative experience, as well as his knowledge of Britain’s geography and people, he was an ideal pick for the job of running Roman operations in Britannia.

Agricola’s two predecessors as governor of Britannia had been considered successful military leaders. Governor Petulius Cerialis (r. 71-73) led significant campaigns against the powerful Brigantes, while Julius Frontinus (r. 73-77) conquered the Silures of southern Wales. When Julius Agricola took the reins of government in Britannia around year 77, he quickly set to work showing that he was equal, nay superior, to his lauded predecessors. In his very first year in office, Agricola spread Roman influence into northern Wales, and even conquered the troublesome island of Mona (now Anglesey). Over the next several years, Agricola turned his attention to the north. By the year 79, he was campaigning by the Forth-Clyde Isthmus and the River Tay. Agricola started pushing toward the Highlands around 82, invading what the Romans called Caledonia, by land and sea. The highlight of the campaign—and the most famous moment of Agricola’s career—was the Battle of Mons Graupius, fought between the Romans and the Caledonians (or more likely a coalition of Pict tribes) in the year 83.

According to the historian Tacitus (Agricola’s son-in-law), the Roman fleet in Britannia was sent out to pillage and cause confusion during the days leading up to the confrontation at Mons Graupius. While the ships were causing terror and worry, Agricola marched his army to Mons Graupius, where a large number of hostile warriors were gathering under a leader whom the Romans called Calgacus. The location of the battle unfortunately remains disputed, but from the name Mons Graupius (‘Graupian Mountain’), the terrain was obviously mountainous or hilly. There were also thick patches of woods within running distance of the site, which would eventually play a part in the battle.

When the Roman army arrived at Mons Graupius, Agricola’s scouts reported that more than 30,000 enemy warriors were present. The Roman legionnaires, although reportedly assisted by 8,000 auxiliary infantry and 3,000 cavalry, were said to have been significantly outnumbered by the Caledonians. Agricola’s arrival at Mons Graupius apparently did not immediately cause a battle to erupt—the Romans had time to build a walled camp at the foot of the hill or mountain. The tense peace, however, would not last, as, according to Tacitus, the Caledonian war-leader, Calgacus, soon sent a portion of his army down the slope to challenge the Roman camp.

Agricola chose to meet the incoming warriors in the field instead of behind his camp walls. He put his auxiliary troops and cavalry on the front line, and positioned his legions in reserve, backed against the walls of the camp. When the two armies came into range of each other, the battle opened up with back-and-forth volleys of missiles. Yet, what was most frightening to the Romans were the numerous chariots rolling out in front of the Caledonian forces. Agricola sent a large portion of his cavalry against the chariots, doing so presumably around the same time as the projectile exchange, for the deadly vehicles were apparently lured away from the front lines and were detained during the opening stages of the battle.

When the first wave of Caledonians had marched down to level ground, Agricola sent forward six Germanic auxiliary cohorts to meet the incoming warriors with swords and shields. These six cohorts were reportedly not chosen arbitrarily, but picked because their fighting style gave them a significant advantage against the Caledonians. The auxiliary forces reached their opponents without any harassment from the chariots, and began battling with the opposing infantry line. Agricola’s choice of the Germanic cohorts apparently paid off, as the warriors from Germania began pushing the first wave of Caledonians back toward the slope of Mons Graupius. When the frontline of the battle began to slowly creep up to higher ground, giving an increasing advantage to the Caledonians, Agricola sent more infantry from his reserves to reinforce the auxiliary cohorts. Around this time, the chariots were also completely defeated by the Roman cavalry, so the horsemen could refocus their efforts on other sections of the battle. Agricola kept some of the horsemen in reserve, but others were sent to crash into the flanks of the Caledonian infantry.

Calgacus and the rest of the uncommitted warriors on Mons Graupius, noticing that Agricola had sent more infantry and cavalry into the fray, finally made the decision to advance with the rest of the Caledonian forces into battle. These fresh warriors charged down the slope and began to envelop the Roman forces who were fighting on the frontline. Agricola countered this move by sending in the rest of the Roman cavalry, which had been held in reserve. Now it was the Caledonian side that was enveloped.

The hammer-and-anvil strikes of the Roman cavalry reportedly won the day. Unable to withstand the flanking attacks of Agricola’s horsemen, Calgacus’ warriors began retreating to the nearby forests. The Caledonians were evidently still organized when they withdrew into the woods, for they set up an ambush against the pursuing Romans. Yet, Agricola thwarted the ambush by ringing his infantry carefully around the woods like hunters, and sent his cavalry charging into the least brushy regions of the forest. These maneuvers reportedly ended any hope for a Caledonian ambush, and Calgacus’ formerly focused troops now began truly fleeing from the battlefield. According to Tacitus, Agricola’s army pursued the Caledonians until nightfall, and by the end of the day, around 10,000 of Calgacus’ warriors were slain.

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Picture Attribution: (Calgacus at Mons Graupius, in Pictorial History of Scotland A.D. 79-1646, 2 vols, vol. I, (London, 1859), [Public Domain] via Creative Commons).

Sources:
  • Agricola and Germania by Tacitus and translated by Harold Mattingly and revised by J. B. Rives. New York: Penguin Classics, 2009.
  • https://www.britannica.com/biography/Gnaeus-Julius-Agricola 
  • https://www.ancient.eu/article/776/tacitus-account-of-the-battle-of-mons-graupius/ 
  • https://www.britannica.com/place/Caledonia-ancient-region-Britain 
  • https://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/britannia/monsgraupius/monsgraupius.html  
  • http://www.battlefieldsofbritain.co.uk/battle_mons_graupius_ad83.html  

Monday, December 18, 2017

The Aberlemno Kirkyard Stone In Scotland And The Battle Of Nechtansmere



The carved standing stones in the village of Aberlemno, Scotland, are beautiful pieces of artwork left behind by the Picts. In particular, the stone known as Aberlemno II tells a significant story. On one side, the stone displays a brilliant cross, but on the reverse, is carved several scenes from a battle of vital importance to the creation of what would become Scotland—the Battle of Nechtansmere.

The prime written source of information on the Battle of Nechtansmere, also known as the Battle of Dun Nechtain, comes from the Northumbrian monk named Bede (c. 673-735), who would have been about 12 years old when the battle occurred. Bede wrote about the battle in his lauded work, the Ecclesiastical History of the English People.

According to Bede, King Ecgfrith of Northumbria made the fateful decision to march his army north in 685 to do battle with the Picts. The Picts were an ancient people of northern Britain who were, at the time, competing for supremacy in the north against the Britons and the Scots. The main leader of the Picts in 685 was a man named Bridei map Bili (alternatively Brude mac Bile, or Brude/Bridei III), the king of Fortriu. He mobilized a force of Picts and quickly maneuvered himself to intercept the Northumbrians. King Bridei possibly also gained the help of an interesting kingdom of Britons centered in the Dumbarton Rock region—known by impressive names, such as the Kingdom of the Rock, Strathclyde, or Alt Clut.

According to Bede, the army of Bridei map Bili found the Northumbrians and lured them deeper into Pictish territory, toward a narrow mountain pass. Finally, the Picts ambushed the Northumbrian army in the Battle of Nechtansmere, somewhere near the modern town of Forfar, within Angus, Scotland. In the ensuing massacre, King Ecgfrith was killed, along with the majority of his army.

The Battle of Nechtansmere was a turning point in the history of the British Isles. The battle halted the expansion of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms to the north, and also served as a clear sign that the Kingdom of Northumbria was in decline. Sometime during the 8th century, the Picts erected the Aberlemno II stone, commemorating the victory of Bridei map Bili over King Ecgfrith and the Northumbrians.

  (Pictish stone in the churchyard at Aberlemno Parish Church (the stone is sometimes known as Aberlemno II). The battle scene depicted is generally accepted to be that of the Battle of Nechtansmere. [Public Domain] via Creative Commons)

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Sources:
  • Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People (and relevant letters), translated by Leo Sherley-Pride, R. E. Latham and D. H. Farmer. New York: Penguin Classics, 2003. 
  • Vanished Kingdoms: The Rise and Fall of States and Nations by Norman Davies. New York: Viking (Penguin Group), 2011. 
  • http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100226775 
  • https://www.ancient.eu/Battle_of_Dun_Nectain/ 
  • http://www.ancient-scotland.co.uk/site.php?a=2 
  • https://www.historyscotland.com/articles/on-this-day-in-history/the-battle-of-nechtansmere-was-fought-on-this-day-in-history 
  • https://www.historicenvironment.scot/visit-a-place/places/aberlemno-sculptured-stones/ 
  • https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ecgfrith 
  • https://www.britannica.com/place/Strathclyde 
  • http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/modern-europe/wars-and-battles/battle-nechtansmere  

Sunday, October 8, 2017

The 16th-Century Flight Of John Damian of Falcuis



King James IV (r. 1488-1513), besides being one of Scotland’s most charismatic and internationally active kings, was also an advocate of education and a generous patron to the arts and sciences. As a king with such a renaissance spirit, European intellectuals were naturally drawn to Scotland to join the court of James IV. Among the interesting courtiers of the king, one ambitious man stood out from the rest of the crowd—John Damian of Falcuis.

In the second half of the 15th century (possibly around 1470) John Damian of Falcuis was born in Italy, the heart of the Renaissance. Young John had a wide variety of interests, but he decided to embark on a career path in medicine. He either studied or practiced in France, later earning him the nickname, the “French Leech,” but eventually found himself employed as the court physician of the Scottish King James IV.

Damian landed in Scotland around 1500 or 1501 and soon found that King James IV was willing to fund studies and experiments that expanded well beyond the typical realm of a court physician. Upon discovering this, John Damian of Falcuis must have been delighted, for he was not only interested in medicine, but was also passionate about alchemy and experimental engineering.

James IV patiently provided funding as John Damian attempted to change base metals into gold, a favorite hobby of alchemists. In between his failed alchemical experiments, Damian also studied how to produce life-prolonging elixirs. Despite his attempts in these fields always ending in disappointment, James IV continued to support the energetic dreamer, and even bestowed on Damian the title of abbot of Tongland.

It was after he had become an abbot that John Damian of Falcuis attempted an experiment that would secure his name in history. This time, however, he was not going to try to create gold or produce an elixir of life. In this experiment, he wanted to achieve what mankind often dreams of while gazing up at the clouds—he wanted to fly.

In 1507, John Damian of Falcuis became obsessed with an idea. After observing and studying birds, Damian deduced that the ability of flight had to come from wings. Therefore, to achieve flight, John Damian simply concluded that he needed to manufacture his own personal set of feathery wings.

With his plan concocted, Damian sent his aids to scavenge the land for eagle feathers—for some reason he had concluded that eagle feathers, and only eagle feathers, could do the job. With all the plumage gathered together, the ambitious inventor pieced together two large wings that he could attach to his arms.

John Damian took his great flight in late September 1507, in the city of Stirling, Scotland. Outfitted in his carefully crafted wings, he climbed to the battlements of Stirling Castle, which stood an estimated 70 feet above the ground. Once he was atop the wall, Damian presumably took a few deep, but shaky, breaths as he looked over the surrounding landscape. Yet, in the end he mustered his courage and leapt from the castle walls. Frantically flapping the makeshift wings with as much energy as he could exert, Damian soared away from the side of Stirling Castle. Nevertheless, he only traveled as far as he could jump, and after that short trip, he was violently pulled down to the hard earth by the unsympathetic force of gravity. Damian was granted a bittersweet blessing, for the force of his crash was somewhat dissipated by the trash heap or dung pile in which he landed. In the end, despite having jumped from the walls of a castle, John Damian of Falcuis only suffered a broken leg as a result of his unsuccessful flight and messy landing. Damian never retried the experiment, but he publicly claimed that his unfortunate crash only occurred because hen feathers had been mistakenly woven into the wings.

Although John Damian was unsuccessful in most of his experimental endeavors, King James IV still found the man’s resolve and determination in the face of failure to be charming. Even after the pseudo scientist broke his leg by jumping from the walls of Stirling Castle, the king’s support never wavered. John Damian of Falcuis was still on the payroll of the Scottish monarch when English forces killed King James IV in 1513, during the Battle of Flodden.

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Top picture attribution: (Illustration of an ornithopter (man with manufactured wings) illustrated prior to 1830 from the Tissandier Collection of early European flight designs, [Public Domain] via Creative Commons).

Sources:
  • Mystery at the Castle, Season 2, Episode 10 
  • http://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/the-alchemist-who-thought-he-could-fly-1-466848 
  • http://www.undiscoveredscotland.co.uk/usbiography/d/johndamian.html 
  • http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/scottishhistory/renaissance/oddities_renaissance.shtml 
  • http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/honoured-at-last-scotlands-answer-to-wright-brothers-526353.html 
  • https://www.britannica.com/biography/James-IV-king-of-Scotland 
  • https://www.britroyals.com/scots.asp?id=james4_scot