Showing posts with label Egypt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Egypt. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Snefru—The Egyptian King Who Built Three Pyramids, Including The First “True” Pyramid Of Egypt



Snefru (flourished 26th century BCE), the inaugural king of the 4th Dynasty in Egypt, was not the first Egyptian ruler to build a pyramid (that honor went to Djoser), nor was he the king to build the largest pyramid (that record was claimed by his son, Khufu). Yet, Snefru surpassed his predecessors and successors in another aspect of pyramid building—quantity. He is credited with constructing three large pyramids and possibly several of the so-called Seven Small Pyramids.

Although Snefru did not create the first pyramid in Egypt, he revolutionized the design of the structures by building the first “true” pyramid. It may have been that very ambition to build a perfect smooth-sided pyramid shape (as opposed to the step-pyramids of his predecessors) that drove the king to produce so many monumental works. Snefru’s pyramids are fascinating, as they show the trial and error that his engineers faced until they finally nailed down a formula for a true pyramid.

The pyramid at Meidum was the first iteration of Snefru’s new vision. It was actually a hybrid of the old way of pyramid building and the revolutionary design that the king wanted to implement. It started out as a seven-step pyramid, but Snefru filled in the steps, encasing the original structure under a smooth-sloped façade. Yet, the hybrid approach turned out to be a disaster. In the end, the outer covering crumbled, revealing the original shape underneath. Even as a step pyramid, the Meidum project did not hold up well against time—only three of the seven original steps remain intact. Many believe that the outer façade of the Meidum pyramid collapsed during Snefru’s lifetime, prompting him to abandon the site and start anew in another location.


(Photograph of the Meidum pyramid in Egypt, [Public Domain] via Creative Commons)

Snefru’s next two large pyramids were built in the region of Dashür. There, he ignored any further hybrid designs and instead committed to a true pyramid shape from day one of construction. Snefru’s first pyramid in Dashür began with sides that sloped at approximately a 55-degree angle. Yet, to the king’s dismay, something went wrong—according to some theories, engineers discovered that the pyramid was leaning, while another version suggests the that the angle of the pyramid threatened to collapse the structure. Whatever the case, engineers were forced to change the angle of the slopes to 43-degrees in the middle of construction. The pyramid was completed, but the result of the two different degrees created an odd shape. It came to be known as the Bent or Blunt Pyramid, which obviously would not please a perfectionist king.

  (Bent Pyramid of Snefru, [Public Domain] via Creative Commons and public-domain-image.com)

Not a man to give up, Snefru began work on a third large pyramid. It was planned to have the same 43-degree slope that his engineers had used to finish the previous project. Yet, this one, if all went well, would hopefully remain uniform and consistent from base to capstone. To Snefru’s great relief, his second pyramid in Dashür, known as the Red Pyramid, was completed without any changes or readjustment, creating the first true pyramid in Egypt.

  (Red Pyramid of Snefru, photographed by Daniel Csörföly, [Public Domain] via Creative Commons)

In addition to the three large pyramids that were constructed by Snefru, he is thought to have also built one or more of the so-called Seven Small Pyramids along the Nile. Among the seven, the Seila Pyramid has several references to Snefru, making him the likely patron of the project. It is also probable that Snefru had a hand in the Edfu Pyramid. The financiers of the final five small pyramids are still under debate, but Snefru’s name often comes up in the conversation. Regardless, Snefru is believed to have been the most prolific pyramid builder of Egypt.

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Picture Attribution: (Detail of King Snefru from his funerary temple of Dahshur now on the main facade of the Egyptian Museum, Cairo, photographed by Juan Lazaro, licensed 2.0 Creative Commons (CC 2.0)).

Sources:
  • https://www.britannica.com/biography/Snefru
  • https://www.ancient-egypt-online.com/snefru.html 
  • https://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk/sneferu.html 
  • https://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk/red-pyramid-dashur.html 
  • https://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk/bent-pyramid-dashur.html 
  • https://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk/seven-small-pyramids.html 
  • https://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk/pyramid-meidum.html  



Thursday, December 13, 2018

Alexander the Great And The Siege of Gaza



The cities on the east coast of the Mediterranean Sea put up some of the staunchest defenses that Alexander the Great would face during his conquests. After Alexander defeated the Persian forces in the 334 BCE battle at the Granicus River and the 333 BCE battle at Issus, the king set his sight on subduing the Middle Eastern coastline and Egypt before marching deeper into the Persian Empire. Amazingly, only two major cities offered resistance to Alexander during his march to Egypt. First, was the island city of Tyre, which Alexander besieged from January to August in 332 BCE. After a grueling standoff, Tyre fell to an assault by land (via an earthen causeway) and by sea. With the Tyrians slaughtered or enslaved by the thousands, Alexander continued his march in peace, not experiencing any resistance, until he reached the fortified city of Gaza. There, a bold eunuch named Batis was inspirited by his personal supply of provisions and mercenaries to resist the invaders.

Alexander arrived at Gaza around September 332 BCE, and laid siege to the fortress. For this battle, Alexander and his engineers did not pull any punches. The besiegers encircled the city with a tall earthwork platform that extended as high as Gaza’s walls. With the platform complete, Alexander deployed his siege engines (likely towers and catapults), facing Gaza’s southern walls, where the defenses looked the weakest.

Batis and his mercenaries rightly saw the looming threat of the siege weapons and decided to launch a sudden attack against the earthwork. Their goal was to burn Alexander’s siege engines and they nearly achieved their mission—Batis had his own artillery and he deployed them to the south, utilizing them alongside archers and slingers to drive the besiegers off the earthwork. The Greek forces were about to falter from the onslaught of projectiles when Alexander arrived in the nick of time to rally his troops. Although the besiegers were victorious against the sortie from Gaza, it came at a cost. Alexander was struck in the shoulder by a projectile fired from the city’s artillery. Unfortunately for the people of Gaza, Alexander’s shield and armor absorbed most of the blow’s impact, and he recovered with remarkable speed. Instead of being crippled or dead, Alexander was still on the frontlines and more inspired than ever to capture the city.

Not long after Alexander was wounded, his navy arrived with a cargo of even more siege weapons, which were left over from the capture of Tyre. With such a stockpile of artillery at his disposal, Alexander expanded his earthwork around Gaza to accommodate the new machines. With his earthwork upgraded, the new siege engines were set up to encircle the town. As if this were not enough, Alexander also deployed sappers to tunnel under the fortifications of Gaza and undermine its walls.

By October of 332 BCE, the defenses of Gaza were in a very poor state due to Alexander’s artillery and sapping. Large swaths of the wall had crumbled or completely collapsed. With breaches appearing all over the fortress, Alexander launched three assaults on Gaza, with debatable commitment to the attack—theses assaults were mainly mounted by archers and the heavy infantry was held in reserve. Yet, on the fourth assault, Alexander threw the full might of his infantry into the fray and overwhelmed the defenders. A predicted 10,000 men of fighting age were slaughtered by Alexander’s forces in the capture of Gaza. The lives of the women and children were spared, but they were ultimately sold into slavery.

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Picture Attribution: (Alexander Instructing his soliders, from The Deeds of Alexander the Great (Antonio Tempesta 1555–1630 Rome), [Public Domain] via Creative Commons)

Sources:
  • The Campaigns of Alexander by Arrian, translated by Aubrey de Sélincourt. New York: Penguin Classics, 1971.
  • Alexander the Great by Philip Freeman. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2011.  
  • Alexander the Great: The Story of an Ancient Life by Thomas R. Martin and Christopher W. Blackwell. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.  

Tuesday, November 13, 2018

Alexander The Great’s Animal Guides To The Siwa Oasis


Alexander the Great was an incredibly religious man. How could he not be? After all, his father’s family claimed to have been descended from Heracles, son of Zeus, and his mother’s family similarly was said to trace their lineage back to the demigod Achilles, son of the goddess Thetis. Additionally, the mother of the famous king convinced herself and her son that Alexander was not fathered by a mortal, but by a god disguised as her husband. As Alexander believed (or wanted his subjects to believe) that the deities were not only gods, but also his family, it is unsurprising that Alexander the Great held countless sacrificial offerings during his campaigns and generally sought out temples of worship wherever he traveled.

One of the most powerful religious pilgrimages that Alexander the Great undertook was his trip to the Siwa Oasis around 332 or 331 BCE. This occurred around the time he founded the Egyptian city of Alexandria, although ancient sources did not agree on whether the pilgrimage took place before or after the founding of the city. In Siwa, there was a famous oracle of the Egyptian god, Amun, whom the Greeks believed to be another interpretation of Zeus. As a supposed descendant of Zeus, Alexander the Great was naturally drawn to the oracle.

Siwa truly was (and is) a fertile oasis surrounded by difficult and treacherous terrain. The Roman general and historian, Arrian (c. 90-173+), used the accounts of Ptolemy (Alexander’s companion who became king of Egypt) and Aristobulus (a civilian friend of Alexander who was concerned with engineering and science) to piece together his own report on the Siwa expedition in his text, The Campaigns of Alexander. As Alexander’s contemporaries told it, the king and his companions marched into the desert, only to find themselves quickly lost. The shifting sands had erased any signs of a path to Siwa, leaving the pilgrims stranded in a deadly landscape with dwindling supplies. Yet, just as Alexander and his companions began to doubt their likelihood of survival, a miracle happened. According to both Ptolemy and Aristobulus, a pair of animals arrived to guide Alexander to Siwa. The two sources, however, disagreed on what type of animal came to the rescue of the famous king. In Ptolemy’s version of the story, two snakes slithered in front of Alexander’s party to show them the way to the oracle. Aristobulus, instead, reported that it was two crows that arrived to guide the stranded conqueror to his destination.

With the help of the animals, Alexander successfully reached Siwa and obtained his audience with the oracle. What the king was told there remains unknown, but perhaps the oracle confirmed the story of divine birth told by Alexander’s mother—after all, coins were later minted that showed Alexander wielding lighting. In any case, Alexander was reportedly a changed man after leaving the temple of Siwa. With his task complete, the king marched back into the desert and was apparently led once more to safety by his animal guides.

Written by C. Keith Hansley

Picture Attribution: (The Flying Raven, by Édouard Manet  (1832–1883), [Public Domain] via Creative Commons).

Sources:
  • The Campaigns of Alexander by Arrian, translated by Aubrey de Sélincourt. New York: Penguin Classics, 1971.
  • Alexander the Great by Philip Freeman. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2011. 
  • Alexander the Great: The Story of an Ancient Life by Thomas R. Martin and Christopher W. Blackwell. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

A Refugee Spartan King Personally Tried To Inspire Alexandria To Rebel Against Ptolemy IV



King Cleomenes III (r. 235-222 BCE) was a powerful ruler of Sparta who tried to revive his country’s reputation as a military powerhouse in Greece. He increased his own personal influence by ruthlessly oppressing the checks against his power, such as the ephors, who usually shared power with the Spartan kings. In addition he initiated significant social and military reform. Socially, Cleomenes wanted to steer his kingdom back into the ways of their no-nonsense, strictly militant past. Militarily, he had adopted the innovations in warfare introduced by Macedonia, including the use of longer spears and improved infantry formations.

Sparta, with its revamped military and a competent king in command, quickly began to wreck havoc on its Peloponnese neighbors. Cleomones’ major rival in the region was the Achaean League, headed by a skilled commander named Aratus of Sicyon. Starting around 229 BCE, King Cleomenes led such a successful campaign against the Achaean League that Aratus of Sicyon took the drastic step of placing his people under the protection of Macedonia in 225 or 224 BCE. As Macedonian troops poured into the Peloponnese, Cleomenes III soon found that he could not pacify his newly conquered land and fight the invaders at the same time. The Macedonian king, Antigonus III, pressed the Spartans back all the way to their native region of Laconia and finally dealt Cleomenes’ army a fatal blow at the 222 BCE Battle of Sellasia. Following the disastrous defeat at Sellasia, Cleomenes III fled to Egypt and Macedonia occupied Sparta.

Ptolemy III, the king of Egypt, gave the fugitive Spartan ruler a warm welcome and allegedly promised to finance a future bid for Cleomenes III to reclaim Sparta. Yet, Ptolemy III died in 221 BCE. The next king of Egypt, Ptolemy IV, reportedly tried to invite Cleomenes III into his circle of advisors. Nevertheless, the powerful people in the Ptolemaic king’s inner circle considered Cleomenes to be a threat to their power and they eventually convinced Ptolemy IV to place the Spartan king under house arrest in Alexandria.

Cleomenes III, however, was not one to be restrained, and he had been eager to return home ever since he learned that the Macedonian king, Antigonus III, had died in 221 BCE. Nevertheless, the Ptolemaic government had little intention of releasing the Spartan king. When it became apparent to Cleomenes that he was truly a captive, he decided to break free.

In 219 BCE, Cleomenes III made his move. According to the account of the biographer, Plutarch (c. 50-120), the first step of Cleomenes’ plan was to confuse the sentries who guarded his house. To do this, Cleomenes called on the friends he had made in the time before being arrested to spread rumors around Alexandria that the Spartan prisoner was to be released. To supplement the rumors, Cleomenes also had cheerful gifts sent to his home, containing congratulations on his imminent release and also wine…lots of wine. The Spartan king graciously shared his wine with the guards around his house, and one day when the guards had indulged too much in the offered drink, a disguised Cleomenes and thirteen companions slipped away unnoticed into the streets of Alexandria.

At this point, Cleomenes’ ambition and arrogance apparently sealed his doom. Why sneak off to the docks and sail home to Sparta when he could capture Alexandria, the jewel of Ptolemaic Egypt. The latter option must have been more appealing to Cleomenes III, for instead of silently sneaking out of the city, the Spartan king and his companions reportedly decided to run like madmen through the streets of Alexandria while shouting for the locals to revolt and reclaim their freedom. The locals, however, wanted nothing to do with the rampaging Spartans and ducked inside their homes.

With the popular uprising plan foiled, Cleomenes decided to enact plan B—a prison riot. According to Plutarch, Cleomenes and his thirteen loyal companions charged for a citadel in Alexandria where prisoners were kept. They were apparently met en route to the fortification by the commander of the city guard, who was reportedly riding on a chariot through the streets. In the first major brawl of the prison-break, Cleomenes and his loyal followers pulled the commander of the guard from his chariot and slaughtered the whole patrol. After that successful skirmish, Cleomenes rushed over to the citadel, eager to free the army of prisoners locked inside. Upon his arrival, however, Cleomenes was quickly reminded that the citadel was a formidable fortress, and the wardens of the prison rudely thwarted the Spartan king’s plan by simply closing the gate.

After the failure of the popular uprising and the prison revolt, Cleomenes eventually accepted that he was defeated. In the end, the Spartan king and his thirteen companions allegedly committed suicide before the full force of the city garrison arrived. When Ptolemy IV heard of this chaotic event, he did not react well. According to Plutarch, the body of Cleomenes III was suspended in a leather bag and the Spartan king’s children, mother and acquaintances were executed.

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Picture Attribution: (Image of a Greek terracotta Storage Jar with Two Warriors. Object Number 86.AE.78, c. 500-480 BCE, [Public Domain] via Creative Commons).

Sources:
  • On Sparta (Life of Cleomenes), excerpted from Plutarch's Parallel Lives, translated by Richard J. A. Talbert. New York: Penguin Classics, 2005.
  • https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ptolemy-IV-Philopator 
  • https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ptolemy-III-Euergetes 
  • https://www.britannica.com/biography/Cleomenes-III 
  • https://www.britannica.com/topic/Achaean-League  

Tuesday, June 5, 2018

King Agesilaus II Of Sparta Commanded A Mercenary Company In Egypt When He Was 84 Years Old



King Agesilaus II had an interesting and paradoxical reign in ancient Sparta. He succeeded to the throne after the death of his brother, King Agis II, in 400 BCE. Agis had a son, named Leotychidas, but he was excluded from the kingship after questions were raised about the legitimacy of his birth. The crown then passed to Leotychidas’ uncle, Agesilaus, who ruled from 400 BCE to around 360 or 359 BCE, a reign of about forty-one years in total. He was a king of tremendous military skill who took the throne at the height of Sparta’s power, yet despite his battlefield prowess, his reign ended with the Spartan empire in tatters.

In the final year of his rule, King Agesilaus was said to have been eighty-four years old. By then, the façade of an unbeatable Sparta had been shattered—Epaminondas, a brilliant military leader from Thebes, defeated the Spartan army in a pitched battle at Leuctra (371 BCE), and laid siege to the wall-less city of Sparta at least two times, in 370 BCE and 362 BCE. Although Sparta survived both sieges and even killed Epaminondas in 362 BCE, their reputation as a state of invincible warriors had been irreparably damaged and the Spartans were even pushed out of their long-held territory of Messenia by Thebes.

Toward the end of his life, elderly King Agesilaus was still trying to reassert Sparta as a major regional power. Despite being in his eighties, he was still very active in the military and international politics. In 360 BCE, King Agesilaus accepted a military contract from Tachos, a Pharaoh of the 30th dynasty of Egypt. The frail Agesilaus personally gathered a band of Greek mercenaries and sailed with them across the Mediterranean to help Tachos in a war against Persia. When he arrived in Egypt, the locals found it hard to reconcile the shrunken old man that they saw before them with the stories of the famous Spartan king who was a veteran of countless battles. The Greek-Roman biographer, Plutarch (c. 46-119 CE), recreated the scene in his Parallel Lives:

“Agesilaus’ name and fame had aroused great interest and high expectations among Egyptians generally, and everyone thronged to catch a glimpse of him. When the sight proved to be nothing brilliant or elaborate, but a pathetic old man of slight build, wrapped in a coarse, shabby cloak, and lying on a patch of grass by the sea, they began to laugh and make fun of him, remarking that here was the perfect illustration of the saying about the mountain being in labour and then giving birth to a mouse” (Life of Agesilaus, chapter 36).

Tachos, too, was unimpressed by what he saw when he met with the Spartan king. The Pharaoh did not give the Spartan a significant position of command in his army, but only left him in charge of the mercenaries he had brought from Greece. In contrast to this, Tachos placed an Athenian named Chambrias in charge of the whole Egyptian fleet. Agesilaus absorbed the laughter and insults of the Egyptians and Tachos without flinching, but he did not forget their words and actions. Unfortunately for the Pharaoh, the Spartan king would soon prove that his military skills were very much still intact.

While Agesilaus II was serving in Egypt, Tachos’ cousin, Nectanebis (or Nectanebo II), launched a coup to usurp power in Egypt. After his cold welcome, Agesilaus had little sympathy for the reigning pharaoh, so he abandoned Tachos and sided with Nectanebis. Tachos eventually fled from Egypt, but before Nectanebis could seize control, an unnamed rival from Mendes raised his own force in an effort to take the Egyptian throne. Nectanebis allegedly had fewer troops than the new upstart, so he withdrew, in fear or by plan, to an unknown city with sturdy defenses. The rival to the throne quickly arrived and laid siege to the city, trapping Nectanebis and Agesilaus inside. The besiegers then began digging a deep trench in a circle around the city to further trap the defenders inside.

When the trench was nearly completed, Agesilaus revealed to Nectanebis that he had a plan. By this point, the trench had almost encircled the city, but there was still a small gap yet to be finished. Agesilaus explained that they could use the enemy’s trenches to their own advantage, using the gap as a bottleneck to swing the balance of power back into their favor. He convinced Nectanebis to move his troops to the gap in the trench once night fell and to attack the besieging forces stationed there. According to Plutarch, the numerically superior besiegers were blocked from doing any devastating flanking maneuvers by the trenches that they themselves had dug. Instead, the two opposing forces clashed, head to head, at the gap between the ends of the trenches. Nectanebis and Agesilaus’ Greek mercenaries quickly proved themselves as the better fighting force and caused their enemies to flee.

Under Agesilaus’ direction, the victorious troops left the gap and confronted the remaining besiegers. With a series of feints and repositioning, Agesilaus eventually cornered the enemy forces between two canals. There, the Spartan was able to fill the space between the channels with his Greek hoplite spearmen and slaughter the army of Nectanebis’ rival.

Not long after that battle, King Agesilaus II decided to return to Sparta. Nectanebis gave the Spartan 230 talents of silver in payment for his help in the war effort. The eighty-four-year-old Spartan King did not survive the journey home. He died in 360 or 359 BCE, while his ships were anchored in a region of Libya known as Menelaus’ Harbor.

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Picture Attribution: (Tondo from an Attic red cup, possibly Briseis and Phoenix (Louvre caption) or Hecamede and Nestor, ca. 490 BC. From Vulci. [Public Domain] via Creative Commons).

Sources:

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

The Alleged Sobering Powers Of The Amethyst Stone



Amethysts, semiprecious stones from the quartz family, have long been an admired item. Throughout history, the gem’s beautiful violet-purple hues have caught the appraising eye of people in all spectrums of society, from commoners to royalty and religious leaders. The supply and demand for amethysts (at least in the region of the Middle East) is thought to have become notable as far back as the Early Dynastic Period of Egypt (very roughly 3150-2600 BCE), when amethyst consumption began to influence the Egyptian economy, as well at the markets of peoples in contact with the Egyptians.

When the stones found a market in ancient Greece, the gem became associated with one of the more interesting gods of the Greek pantheon. The wine-like purple color of the amethyst eventually became closely associated with the deity known as Dionysos. He was a god of vegetation and fertility, with an emphasis in music, dancing and wine, along with all the emotions that come with overindulgence in his lattermost specialty. In the epic poem, Dionysiaca, the Greek-Egyptian poet, Nonnus, wrote that the earth goddess, Rheia, gave Dionysos an amethyst to counteract the effects of alcohol, a substance that Dionysos is rarely (if ever) portrayed without in ancient artworks.

Interestingly, most etymologists believe that the word, amethyst, was derived from an ancient Greek phrase that loosely translated to “not intoxicated” or “not drunken.” In keeping with the stone’s interesting name, and its association with Dionysus, the god of wine, many ancient people allegedly thought that by wearing a ring or an amulet of amethyst, they could somehow resist the intoxicating powers of their alcoholic beverages. With the accessibility of amethysts in today’s market, this is a theory that can be easily tested by curious readers—with responsible moderation, of course. Cheers!

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Top picture attribution: (Dionysus statue in Rome photographed by Derek Key, decked out (through editing) with public domain amethyst jewelry).

Sources:
  • https://www.britannica.com/topic/amethyst
  • https://www.gia.edu/amethyst-history-lore 
  • https://www.americangemsociety.org/page/februarybirthstone  
  • https://www.etymonline.com/word/amethyst
  • http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Amethyst 
  • http://www.theoi.com/Text/NonnusDionysiaca12.html 
  • https://www.britannica.com/place/ancient-Egypt/The-Predynastic-and-Early-Dynastic-periods#toc22290  

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

The Unbelievable Story Of The Semi-Mythical Pharaoh, Sesostris




An interesting character named Sesostris made an appearance in the work of Herodotus (490-425/420 BCE), who is considered to be the father of the history genre and profession. Even though Herodotus was a historian, his work was thoroughly laced with folklore and mythology, and he often made no attempt to separate sober fact from theatrical embellishment. As such, fair warning is in order—this article is not about what actually occurred in ancient Egypt. Instead, this article takes a look at the bizarre piece of folklore that Herodotus recorded about the semi-mythical pharaoh, Sesostris.

Modern historians think that Herodotus’ Sesostris was an exaggerated character that combined, under one name, the feats of several historical Twelfth Dynasty (roughly 20th-18th century BCE) pharaohs of Egypt, particularly Senusret (or Senwosret) I and II, as well as Ramses II. Herodotus, or the sources he drew upon, collected the accomplishments of theses pharaohs under the broad character of Sesostris, claiming that this mythical man was an expansionist king who successfully conquered lands from Ethiopia in the south, to the borderlands of the Thracian and Scythian territory in the north.

The most shocking story about Sesostris came after Herodotus finished recording the conquests of this fictitious king. As the tale goes, Sesostris was returning to Egypt after years of continuous war. He was met by his brother at the edge of the Nile Delta, at a place called Daphne, near the city of Pelusium. This brother hosted a banquet for Sesostris, and also invited Sesostris’ wife, as well as two of the pharaoh’s six sons, to attend the event. This brother, however, was not looking to celebrate—he had tasted power as the governor of Egypt while the pharaoh was away, and did not want to relinquish control back to Sesostris. Therefore, the brother had firewood piled around the venue where the banquet was being hosted and set fire to the place while Sesostris was inside.

Sesostris had not expected such treachery from his brother and soon found himself surrounded by a wall of flames. With the flames closing in, Sesostris’ wife proposed an unthinkable solution. She calmly explained that she and Sesostris could easily escape the moat of fire by simply using their two sons who were present at the banquet as a bridge over the deadly heat. Sesostris was apparently willing to sacrifice his children to save himself and his wife. According to the grim tale, the royal couple nonchalantly used the bodies of their sons as a way to escape the trap, leaving the two princes to burn to death in the fire.

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Top picture attribution: (Pyramids of Giza and circular flames, both [Public Domain] via Pixabay.com).

Sources:
  • From The Histories by Herodotus (Book II), translated by Aubrey De Sélincourt and revised by John Marincola (Penguin Classics, 2002).